Searching for answers
Landlocked residents feel ignoredEditor’s
note: This is an installment in a series of articles
taking a look at the landlocked situation of the residents
who live off 144th Street.
By Rodika Tollefson, KP News
Max and JoAnn Aikins did what many people do when they
buy a house — sinking savings, borrowed funds, or in their
case, pensions, into it. Max, who used to build FHA
houses, knew his way around permits. There was one thing
about their property that wasn’t ideal, but they were
willing to deal with it for a time.
“When we bought out here, we were told (our road) was a
county road and when there was enough population, it would
be developed,” he says. “We were willing to build and sit
it out.”
That was in 1969. The road, known on maps as 144th and
in many documents as Pole Line Road, is a utility
right-of-way used by Tacoma Power. It has long been used
by residents for access — illegally, according to the
utility. Today, residents whose only access to their
property is through this road are unable to do any work
that requires county permits.
“I’m a little upset because we were told it(road
development) would happen,” Joann Aikins says. “Everything
we had, we poured into it (our house). Our home is not
worth the value we put into it.”
The Aikinses say all the documents they have
seemed to indicate 144th was a legal road, and they even
purchased additional land to have legal access to their
home off 144th (see previous story, June 2005). The couple
is among several dozen property owners who are unable to
remodel, expand, build and in some cases repair their
homes.
“There are so many families affected by this, how can
they (county officials) turn their back on us?” says Doug
Sherman, who obtained a permit to build his home in 1993,
but after it lapsed was not able to renew it. He no longer
can develop an adjacent property he originally bought with
the intent to develop later. “A lot of people who moved
here, myself included, were not made aware of this.”
Harv Ennis says he was aware that there was an easement
on the road when he purchased the property in 1978 but
didn’t see a red flag until four or five years ago, when
he received a significant reduction in taxes. “They said
there is no more building permits and the county reduced
the taxes,” he says. “That was the first official word.”
A look back
A lawsuit in 1923 condemned portions of private
properties alongside the road in order to develop the
power line that stretches from Tacoma to the Cushman Dam.
Since then, citizens continued to buy and sell land and
homes that used the road as the only access; a school bus
picked up children along the road until the utility asked
the school district to discontinue the practice in 1976;
and the residents petitioned the county multiple times,
and sued it at least once in the 1970s, to try to make it
maintain the road.
Letters between Pierce County and City of Tacoma’s
Department of Public Utilities and internal memos dated
between 1969 and 1973 indicate ongoing discussions between
the two entities about the possibility of giving the
county a right-of-way on 144th for building a road.
June 5, 1969; from Light Division Superintendent J.D.
Cockrell to County Engineer William Thornton: “Light
Division engineers have studied the matter to determine
the portion of the transmission line right of way which
might be available for use by the County as part of the
County Road right of way…we are forwarding one set of
prints…showing in green the proposed easement.”
June 7, 1973; from Director of Utilities A.J. Benedetti
to Thornton, by now a Public Works director: “The Light
Division has indicated a willingness to pay all costs to
reconstruct (three timber bridges) to minimum county
standards, and to furnish right-of-way from its existing
transmission line properties if Pierce County will assume
and pay all other costs of construction and maintenance
and agrees to hold the city harmless for any liability
caused by or arising out of construction, maintenance and
use of the roadway and bridges.”
By 1975, Thornton wrote to a landowner that “City Light
has not made a proposal to Pierce County that Pierce
County is willing to accept.”
County easement off the table
The county had considered building a new road north of
the transmission road, but the efforts did not succeed
because “the land owners in the area wanted large sums of
money for those rights of way,” Thornton told the county
Board of Commissioners in 1971, and recommended that the
county not take over the existing road nor grade or
surface it. However, in 1973 the county purchased a
60-foot-wide easement for a public road from at least one
resident.
When the discussions stalled three decades ago, it
appeared one of the reasons was the county’s unwillingness
to pay the costs to bring the road to county standards.
Last year, Pierce County Councilman Terry Lee expressed a
similar sentiment, saying the county did not even have
money to spend on roads with much bigger traffic.
But Tacoma Power Superintendent Steve Klein says he’s
not sure the easement option “even existed.” “I don’t know
that it ever had any momentum,” he says.
In the last few months, Lee and other county officials
have been discussing possible solutions with Tacoma Power
— ones that don’t involve using 144th. “I think the people
involved in (discussions) are the ones who can solve the
problem,” he says. “The good news is the county is
committed to solving this and I didn’t get that sense
before.”
Some residents are not so sure. Tacoma Power plans to
install electronic gates along the road in the near
future, and there is likely to be a catch: Only residents
who will sign a release of liability will get access, and
even if they do, they will still not be able to get
permits. Some residents told the KP News they are not
willing to sign anything giving away the rights they feel
they had when they purchased their homes. There are other
problems too: Not all neighbors are cooperating, and have
created several groups that are taking different
approaches.
“We are all just kind of stuck,” says Tina Lott. “We
are caught in a loophole, and we feel we’re being
strong-armed by Tacoma Power.”
Next month: The question of maps – and why some
landowners believe 144th was a county road; also a look at
what’s on the discussion table.
Related links:
Landlocked residents
want answers, June 2005 Key Pen News
©Copyright 2005-2008, Key Peninsula
News, all rights reserved.
|