Keep rural character
or add more jobs?
Conflicting questions at Key Pen planning board’s table
By Rodika Tollefson, KP
News
Like many
rural areas, the Key Peninsula depends largely on nearby
cities for its jobs. And most people who are lured to the
area by its beauty and peacefulness don’t mind — the
commute is the price they are willing to pay for their
small piece of tranquility.
But as the Key
Peninsula population continues to grow, so does the
pressure to bring more services and jobs to the area.
The local business
community says the imbalance between housing and jobs is a
problem. Some residents disagree. The Key Peninsula
Community Planning Board is looking to find the happy
medium.
“One thing affects
another. If development were to happen such that jobs for
all residents are created on the Key Peninsula, the
character of the community will be very different from
what it is,” says Rob Allen, economic development
specialist for Pierce County. “The trick is to find the
balance — what’s the appropriate mix?”
KP
community planning
For information about the Key Peninsula Planning
Board, including a list of members, the work
program, agendas, maps, and an opportunity to
provide input, go to
www.piercecountywa.org/landuse or call 798-2700.
The meetings are twice a month, at 7 p.m., and the
new location is the Key Center Library. The July
meeting dates are 6 and 27. |
One of the KP
planning board’s communitywide goals says, “Providing
employment opportunities for local residents is a
community priority.” Another says that “commercial
activities in rural centers should provide the basic
goods, services, and employment needed by local
residents.” Part of the board’s vision statement is to
“promote a small town, socially connected community
dominated by a rural landscape” and “preserve the
characteristics of the community…”
Within this
framework, the group will create a vision of how the Key
Pen will look in the next 20 years, and how much
development it should encourage.
The numbers vs. ‘the experts’
Pierce County
estimates show that 387 firms are located on the Key
Peninsula and employ about 1,270 people. More than 70
percent of residents commute 30 or more minutes to get to
work. Roughly 14 percent of the residents who are in the
workforce are self-employed (compared to 6 percent in the
county).
“We think jobs for
residents out here are a quality of life issue, and there
aren’t many jobs for the family wage earner. We’re also
concerned that everyone who lives here has to commute and
puts a strain on transportation. We consider that an
imbalance between jobs and housing,” says Ed Taylor, owner
of the Westwynd Motel in Purdy and member of the Key
Peninsula Business Association. Taylor chaired a KPBA
committee that submitted the business association’s
position on economic development to a recent meeting of
the planning board.
The KPBA’s statement
says there will be an eventual need for thousands of jobs,
and “enough property should be designated for commercial
uses.” Providing areas for administrative and professional
offices on or near roads feeding into the planned State
Route 302 corridor is one of the suggestions. That may
suit the local needs well, since nearly one-third of the
local population is estimated to work in management,
professional and related occupations, and another 23
percent in sales and office jobs.
Providing a large
area for future development of senior housing, another
priority outlined by the KPBA, is also backed up by
statistics. While only 10 percent of the Key Pen’s
population was 65 years or older in 2000, according to the
U.S. Census, by 2020 another 27 percent of residents will
be in that age category.
Yet statistics are
not necessarily the biggest ingredient when it comes to
planning the area’s future economic development. “The
people who live in the community are the experts on the
community,” says Allen, who has been guiding the KP
Community Planning Board through the economic development
element. “They know better than anyone else what their
community is and what it should be.”
A good portion of
Key Pen residents seem to agree with the KPBA. A survey
done in conjunction with the planning board’s work shows
that 59 percent of the respondents would like more KP
employment opportunities, and 42 percent feel more
commercial property should be made available for
professional and retail businesses. The need is there too
— 77 percent of the respondents said they purchased the
majority of their commercial goods outside the area.
However, nearly half of the respondents said they were
satisfied with how far they had to travel to get those
services.
The board meetings
have generated a wide interest, and Allen says this
participation is one of the Key Peninsula’s strengths in
creating the future vision. “I am constantly amazed at the
number” of people who come to the meetings, he said. “The
fact that the business community was willing to come out
and make a presentation … speaks to the involvement and
the desire for self-determination.”
The challenges
Not everyone wants
to see office buildings and more retail pop up on this
side of the Purdy Bridge. One resident posed this question
to the board: “Why do you want to bring the city here?”
“Nine out of 10
Washingtonians don’t know where the Key Peninsula is and
we like it that way,” Pat Latshaw said at a recent
meeting.
That doesn’t sit
well with one of the KPBA suggestions: creating a
destination resort on the waterfront. The idea of bringing
more tourists is attractive for business owners, and
certainly fits the concept of economic development, of
bringing in more money than flows out. On the other hand,
more tourists means more traffic on already problem roads,
and more pressure on services like first aid that are
already stretched to the max.
“Some say, ‘Get out
of the way and let economic development happen,’ and
others say Gig Harbor North is close enough,” is how
resident Judy Austin, who has attended subcommittee
meetings regularly, sums up the dilemma.
KP population is
expected to grow to 19,800 in year 2020, based on Office
of Financial Management estimates (the county’s numbers
are slightly more conservative). The increased residential
base puts more pressure on local services such as schools
and fire districts, yet provides much less tax revenue to
support those services than commercial use would.
“Our tax base is
being really restrictive but as people move out here, they
want more service,” says Jim Bosch, a Fire District 16
commissioner who is on the 15-member planning board. At
this rate, the fire district will not be able to handle
population growth, he says.
In fact, the
district’s 2004 budget showed a less than 2 percent
increase in revenues from 2003, and a 12 percent increase
in expenditures (a big part is due to Initiative 747). The
district’s projections show an additional 69 service calls
per year through 2012; from 1994 to 2013, that’s about
double the number of calls.
“Homes bring
patients and costs, and commercial (use) brings money,”
Bosch says.
On the other hand, as Allen stated, providing too much
commercial development would alter the community
character, and preserving the character including its
“unique marine attributes, history of each distinct
community and agricultural and forest lands” is one of the
plan’s objectives. And even providing more commercial
development may not be as easy, because geographical
limitations narrow the market for some industries. People
will only be willing to cross the Purdy Bridge for certain
things, which means some retail and professional services
may not have a sufficient customer base.
“There is potential
conflict” between jobs and maintaining rural character,
and “the community has to come to grips with it,” Allen
says.
The Key Peninsula
Community Plan is intended to do just that, find the right
balance, and outline the current conditions and the
desired ones along with specific actions and
recommendations.
“Successful rural communities use tools, like
comprehensive planning, to attract or retain the kind of
business that makes sense for the area,” says a document
by the state Community, Trade and Economic Development
Department titled “Keeping the Rural Vision: Protecting
and Planning for Rural Development.” The document is one
of the references used by the planning board sub-committee
on economic development and land use as it looks to
formulate the next element of the plan.
Will the Key Pen
become a successful rural community? Time will tell. If
the diverse group that has been engaging in spirited, if
not heated, discussions continues to participate in the
process, chances are good that the planning board members
will find that right mix between jobs, development, and
preserving natural beauty and character. Board members say
they are ready to listen, and to use the diversity to
create the right plan.
Next
month: We take a look at issues of land use.
©Copyright 2005-2008, Key Peninsula
News, all rights reserved.
|