Prisoners on their own land?
‘Landlocked’ residents want answers
By Rodika Tollefson, KP News
Editor’s note: The Key Peninsula News first reported
in October 2003 about residents on so-called 144th Street
who are not able to use their properties in any way that
requires permits. Since then, they’ve continued to search
for answers on how they can end the situation, and they
feel their elected officials have turned their backs on
them while they pay taxes on properties with greatly
diminished values. The Key Peninsula News is looking for
answers as well, and will present the three sides — the
residents’, the county’s and Tacoma Power’s — in a series
of articles starting with this June issue.
Lance and Tina Lott moved to the Key Peninsula in 2003
from Minnesota. Attracted by the same features that brings
newcomers here — proximity to the water, quiet lifestyle,
birds roaming —they settled on more than an acre of land.
The home was even Tina’s favorite color: yellow.
“We fell in love with the Key Peninsula,” she
said. “It gives you a sense of being away.”
Just a few weeks after their move, they had the first
sign of what would later become a fight for their property
rights. As they eventually found out, some of their
neighbors have held the same fight for years.
The Lotts live off a gravel right-of-way that on many
maps is called 144th Street and is nicknamed Pole Line
Road, a utility road used by Tacoma Power to service its
power line that stretches from Tacoma to the Cushman Dam.
For years, the residents used the road to access their
homes, develop their property and get their mail. Many of
them say they had no idea that, according to Tacoma Power,
they were using the road “illegally.”
“We saw an article in the Key Peninsula News (October
2003) and we thought that was weird,” Tina said. The
article described a landlocked situation their neighbors
found themselves in, and the Lotts asked their realtor to
look into it.
“We didn’t think anything of it and went about our
married life, and one day came home and there is a gate,”
Tina Lott said.
The gate, installed off 118th Street, is one of several
on the right-of-way. Tacoma Power spokesperson Chris
Gleason said at a neighborhood meeting that the utility
needed to protect the area but that it would provide
residents and emergency services with access.
It costs the utility between $30,000 and $50,000 to
clean up junk cars and other garbage along the road, she
said, and “it’s really not reasonable to send crews to
clean up the property.”
For many residents, however, the gates are the least of
their worries. For several years, Pierce County stopped
issuing permits to all property owners who cannot show
alternative access to their plats.
Joe Geier learned about the problem nearly two years
ago, when he tried to help his son build a home on a
portion of his 15 acres. What he found, he said, was a
dilemma going back 80 years, after a lawsuit that
condemned portions of the properties on 144th for the
utility road. Geier believes the lawsuit never took the
residents’ right of using the road. He questioned why the
county issued permits two or three decades ago and not
now. There is no exact count on the number of properties
affected, but residents estimate between 50 and 80.
“We’ve asked the county not to issue any more permits
because we are liable for the right-of-way,” Gleason told
the residents.
According to Pierce County Councilman Terry Lee, the
county has never done title reports to guarantee access
for issuing a permit, and the parcels are flagged “only
when someone complains” and “it comes on the radar
screen.” However, a July 2003 letter to Joseph J. Geier
written by county Executive John Ladenburg and signed on
his behalf by Chief of Staff Lyle Quasim states: “Section
503 of the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 12.03 of the
Pierce County Code require that appropriate access be
provided in order to obtain a building permit.”
Back in 1971, Pierce County Public Works Director WM.
R. Thornton described the situation in a letter to the
Board of Commissioners: “Residents were able to purchase
land in the area and therefore were able to obtain
building permits from the County. There is no way that we
know of whereby the County can refuse a building permit to
any resident even though, to the best of our knowledge,
there is no access to the property” except “via this City
Light road.”
When Max and Joann Aikins moved to the area nearly 40
years ago, they said they were told by county officials
that 144th was an undeveloped county road, and that it
would be developed once more residents populated the area.
The Aikins even purchased an additional 5-acre parcel in
1988 in order to have legal access to their home — via
144th. On their “Declaration of Boundary Line Revision,” a
map shows their access from the right-of-way, called C.D.
Rowley Road, running along Tacoma’s transmission line. The
map has the stamp of approval of the boundary revision by
the county Planning Department. It is one of several
documents and maps that make reference to the road.
“It is a transmission right-of-way, it’s not a road, it
will never be a road,” Tacoma Power Superintendent Steve
Kline said. “I don’t refute somebody illegally calls it a
road…It is our property, I don’t care what the maps say.”
Two to three decades ago, there were discussions
between the county and the utility about making the
right-of-way a county road. Today, both the county and the
utility say that doesn’t appear to be an option, and each
side says they’ve tried to cooperate with the other but
the other doesn’t.
“The county has washed their hands of it. We don’t see
it as Tacoma Power’s responsibility to maintain the
right-of-way,” Gleason said at the neighborhood meeting.
“We’ve been trying for years to cooperate with the county
and they’re just not with it.”
Lee said at a different neighborhood meeting the
following month: “It doesn’t look like Tacoma Power is
interested in playing ball.”
In the meantime, the two jurisdictions have agreed to
share the cost of installing electronic gates, answering
the residents’ concerns about safety with manual gates.
The jurisdictions also appear to agree on one thing:
Residents must find an alternative access, via easements
and other ways. The residents are racing against the
clock: According to one neighbor, Tacoma Power will only
allow them to use the road for access for two years while
resients find another way.
Next month: A look through the years at the discussions
between the three involved parties, and the impact of the
situation on the owners today.
©Copyright 2005-2008, Key Peninsula
News, all rights reserved.
|