|
Voters to decide Yanity fate
By Rick Sorrels, Special to KP News
The voters will decide if Fire District 16 Commissioner
Allen Yanity should be removed or stay in office. This
was the decision of Pierce County Superior Court Judge
Armijo on Oct. 19.

Al Yanity
Photo by Hugh McMillan |
Fellow Commissioner Jim Bosch filed
a recall petition with the Pierce County Auditor on
Sept. 28, citing Yanity’s alleged physical assault upon
Bosch at an earlier commissioner’s meeting as grounds to
bring a recall vote to the voters. The prosecutor’s
office agreed that the petition met the minimum
standards for a recall petition and forwarded it to the
judge for hearing to determine if the recall would
continue to be processed.
Yanity appeared in person at the
hearing without an attorney, and without having filed
any written response to the recall petition. Armijo
stated at the hearing, “I am not required to determine
guilt or innocence. The electorate will determine truth
or falsity at the election. The recall will go forward.”
On the day before the hearing,
Yanity said in an interview, “I would actually welcome a
recall vote. The truth will come out. I will prevail.”
After the hearing decision was announced, when asked if
he would appeal the decision, Yanity said, “I haven’t
made that decision yet.”
The next step in the recall process
is the gathering of signatures from registered voters.
State law allows six months to gather signatures “equal
to 35 percent of the total number of votes cast for all
candidates for the office to which the officer whose
recall is demanded was elected at the preceding
election.” This exact number has not yet been
determined.
Bosch said, “I won’t be gathering
signatures myself; a committee will form and accomplish
that task. Potential committee members have been
identified. They expect to start collecting signatures
in about 30 days. Over 2,000 signatures will be needed
to provide a safety margin for potential invalid
signatures.”
The Auditor’s Office reports there
are 9,302 current registered voters within FD- 16. This
number includes absentee voters who live outside the
district.
Mike Salatino, who heads a
committee working to recall both Yanity and Bosch, said,
“They both have to go. We can’t put up with their antics
any longer. This committee is being careful in gathering
evidence to ensure that both Yanity and Bosch are
recalled from office. We’ve documented a number of very
serious discrepancies and instances of wrongdoing and
conflicts of interest. We expect to file recall
petitions in a couple of months.”
With the time needed to gather
signatures and prepare the matter for ballot after
signatures are verified, the voters might expect to see
the recall on the ballot as early as the August 2008
primary election.
When asked for his response to a
possible recall petition to be filed by Salatino, Bosch
said, “If they come up with something concrete that I
willfully did wrong, then I will seriously consider
resigning instead of facing a recall. If I don’t belong
in office, I’ll be the first one to remove myself.”
Yanity is also facing a criminal
charge of felony assault against Bosch, with a jury
trial set for Nov. 13. If he is convicted of a felony,
he would automatically be ineligible for office, and the
position would be declared vacant. It remains to be seen
if an appeal of a felony conviction would allow Yanity
to stay in office pending the outcome of the appeal.
If Yanity is found not guilty in
the criminal trial, or if he is found guilty of a
misdemeanor instead of a felony, he would still face the
recall that Armijo authorized. In a recall election, the
voters, through the ballot box, act as the judge and
jury to determine guilt (recall) or innocence (stay in
office). The evidence is usually presented to the voters
through the media.
©Copyright 2005-2008, Key Peninsula
News, all rights reserved.
|